Dominica vs Rwanda: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Dominica
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.8438 kg/ha against 0.8437 kg/ha in Dominica, a difference of 0.0001 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Dominica ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3557 kg/ha | 0.9742 kg/ha | 0.6185 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 0.3412 kg/ha | 0.8202 kg/ha | 0.479 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 0.3817 kg/ha | 0.7491 kg/ha | 0.3674 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 0.4182 kg/ha | 0.7127 kg/ha | 0.2945 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.6732 kg/ha | 0.9211 kg/ha | 0.2479 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.8437 kg/ha | 0.7124 kg/ha | 0.1313 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2020s | 0.8437 kg/ha | 0.8111 kg/ha | 0.0326 kg/ha | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Dominica or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0.8438 kg/ha against 0.8437 kg/ha in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Dominica and Rwanda?
- 0.0001 kg/ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Rwanda rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Dominica ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).