Eastern Asia vs Tajikistan: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eastern Asia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 1.62 kg/ha against 0.8618 kg/ha in Eastern Asia, a difference of 0.7582 kg/ha.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.9 times Eastern Asia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eastern Asia ahead.
Eastern Asia ranks 2nd and Tajikistan ranks 5th of 29 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eastern Asia averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8673 kg/ha | 0.5889 kg/ha | 0.2784 kg/ha | Eastern Asia |
| 2000s | 0.8364 kg/ha | 0.7184 kg/ha | 0.1179 kg/ha | Eastern Asia |
| 2010s | 0.8055 kg/ha | 1.13 kg/ha | 0.322 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 0.864 kg/ha | 1.6 kg/ha | 0.7363 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Eastern Asia or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 1.62 kg/ha against 0.8618 kg/ha in Eastern Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Eastern Asia and Tajikistan?
- 0.7582 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Asia and Tajikistan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eastern Asia ranks 2nd and Tajikistan ranks 5th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).