Ecuador vs Sudan: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ecuador
- Sudan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0661 kg/ha against 0.0581 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.008 kg/ha.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 166th and Sudan ranks 169th of 201 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0919 kg/ha | 0.0458 kg/ha | 0.0461 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0683 kg/ha | 0.0598 kg/ha | 0.0085 kg/ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Ecuador or Sudan?
- Ecuador, at 0.0661 kg/ha against 0.0581 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Ecuador and Sudan?
- 0.008 kg/ha, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Sudan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 166th and Sudan ranks 169th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).