Egypt vs Nigeria: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Egypt
- Nigeria
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 1.75 kg/ha against 1.74 kg/ha in Nigeria, a difference of 0.01 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.
Egypt ranks 3rd and Nigeria ranks 4th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Nigeria in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.29 kg/ha | 2.17 kg/ha | 0.8728 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 1970s | 1.56 kg/ha | 2.06 kg/ha | 0.4959 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 1980s | 1.8 kg/ha | 1.9 kg/ha | 0.1054 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 1990s | 1.57 kg/ha | 1.7 kg/ha | 0.1225 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 1.3 kg/ha | 1.51 kg/ha | 0.2078 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 1.59 kg/ha | 1.5 kg/ha | 0.0923 kg/ha | Egypt |
| 2020s | 1.86 kg/ha | 1.67 kg/ha | 0.1829 kg/ha | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Egypt or Nigeria?
- Egypt, at 1.75 kg/ha against 1.74 kg/ha in Nigeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Egypt and Nigeria?
- 0.01 kg/ha, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Nigeria?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Nigeria rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Egypt ranks 3rd and Nigeria ranks 4th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).