Eritrea vs Fiji: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- Fiji
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.0971 kg/ha against 0.0857 kg/ha in Fiji, a difference of 0.0114 kg/ha.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 144th and Fiji ranks 147th of 186 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1938 kg/ha | 0.0287 kg/ha | 0.1651 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.1067 kg/ha | 0.0347 kg/ha | 0.072 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0.0967 kg/ha | 0.0708 kg/ha | 0.026 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 0.0966 kg/ha | 0.0911 kg/ha | 0.0056 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Eritrea or Fiji?
- Eritrea, at 0.0971 kg/ha against 0.0857 kg/ha in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Eritrea and Fiji?
- 0.0114 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Fiji?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Fiji rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 144th and Fiji ranks 147th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).