Eritrea vs New Caledonia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Eritrea
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0.0991 kg/ha against 0.0971 kg/ha in Eritrea, a difference of 0.002 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 156th and New Caledonia ranks 155th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1938 kg/ha | 0.1237 kg/ha | 0.07 kg/ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.1067 kg/ha | 0.1275 kg/ha | 0.0207 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 0.0967 kg/ha | 0.1411 kg/ha | 0.0444 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 0.0966 kg/ha | 0.147 kg/ha | 0.0504 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Eritrea or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 0.0991 kg/ha against 0.0971 kg/ha in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Eritrea and New Caledonia?
- 0.002 kg/ha, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and New Caledonia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and New Caledonia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Eritrea ranks 156th and New Caledonia ranks 155th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).