Estonia vs Lebanon: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Lebanon
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.6546 kg/ha against 0.6115 kg/ha in Lebanon, a difference of 0.0431 kg/ha.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 48th and Lebanon ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.19 kg/ha | 0.3969 kg/ha | 0.7963 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 1.01 kg/ha | 0.5365 kg/ha | 0.4701 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.7126 kg/ha | 0.4915 kg/ha | 0.221 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0.6867 kg/ha | 0.6249 kg/ha | 0.0618 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Estonia or Lebanon?
- Estonia, at 0.6546 kg/ha against 0.6115 kg/ha in Lebanon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Estonia and Lebanon?
- 0.0431 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Lebanon?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Lebanon rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 48th and Lebanon ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).