Estonia vs Slovak Republic: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.6546 kg/ha against 0.6158 kg/ha in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.0388 kg/ha.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Slovak Republic's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 48th and Slovak Republic ranks 50th of 185 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.22 kg/ha | 0.5525 kg/ha | 0.6651 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 1.01 kg/ha | 0.6836 kg/ha | 0.323 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.7126 kg/ha | 0.6507 kg/ha | 0.0619 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0.6867 kg/ha | 0.6729 kg/ha | 0.0138 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Estonia or Slovak Republic?
- Estonia, at 0.6546 kg/ha against 0.6158 kg/ha in Slovak Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Estonia and Slovak Republic?
- 0.0388 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Slovak Republic?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Slovak Republic rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 48th and Slovak Republic ranks 50th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).