Ethiopia PDR vs Honduras: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Honduras
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 0.2034 kg/ha against 0.2028 kg/ha in Honduras, a difference of 0.0006 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 125th and Honduras ranks 126th of 201 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2003 kg/ha | 0.0823 kg/ha | 0.118 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 0.1776 kg/ha | 0.0977 kg/ha | 0.0799 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 0.1949 kg/ha | 0.1348 kg/ha | 0.06 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 0.2103 kg/ha | 0.1607 kg/ha | 0.0495 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Honduras?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 0.2034 kg/ha against 0.2028 kg/ha in Honduras as of 1992.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Honduras?
- 0.0006 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Honduras?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Honduras rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 125th and Honduras ranks 126th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).