Ethiopia PDR vs Sri Lanka: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0.2132 kg/ha against 0.2034 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.0098 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 113th and Sri Lanka ranks 110th of 185 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2003 kg/ha | 0.3098 kg/ha | 0.1095 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 0.1776 kg/ha | 0.3215 kg/ha | 0.1439 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 0.1949 kg/ha | 0.3684 kg/ha | 0.1736 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 0.2103 kg/ha | 0.3567 kg/ha | 0.1464 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 0.2132 kg/ha against 0.2034 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0098 kg/ha, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Sri Lanka rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 113th and Sri Lanka ranks 110th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).