Ethiopia PDR vs Uganda: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0.204 kg/ha against 0.2034 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.0006 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 125th and Uganda ranks 124th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2003 kg/ha | 0.2809 kg/ha | 0.0805 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1970s | 0.1776 kg/ha | 0.2604 kg/ha | 0.0828 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1980s | 0.1949 kg/ha | 0.1586 kg/ha | 0.0363 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 0.2103 kg/ha | 0.1854 kg/ha | 0.0249 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0.204 kg/ha against 0.2034 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Uganda?
- 0.0006 kg/ha, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Uganda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Uganda rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 125th and Uganda ranks 124th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).