Ethiopia vs Mongolia: Seed β Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed β Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 0.2288 kg/ha against 0.2214 kg/ha in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0074 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mongolia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 116th and Mongolia ranks 119th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2456 kg/ha | 0.23 kg/ha | 0.0157 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 0.2635 kg/ha | 0.1776 kg/ha | 0.086 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 0.212 kg/ha | 0.2334 kg/ha | 0.0214 kg/ha | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.2233 kg/ha | 0.2267 kg/ha | 0.0034 kg/ha | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed β cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia or Mongolia?
- Ethiopia, at 0.2288 kg/ha against 0.2214 kg/ha in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed β cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia and Mongolia?
- 0.0074 kg/ha, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Mongolia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Mongolia rank globally for seed β cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 116th and Mongolia ranks 119th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed β Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).