Ethiopia vs Zambia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Ethiopia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0.2333 kg/ha against 0.2288 kg/ha in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.0045 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 116th and Zambia ranks 114th of 201 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2456 kg/ha | 0.169 kg/ha | 0.0766 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 0.2635 kg/ha | 0.1906 kg/ha | 0.073 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 0.212 kg/ha | 0.1919 kg/ha | 0.0201 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 0.2233 kg/ha | 0.2124 kg/ha | 0.0108 kg/ha | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Ethiopia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0.2333 kg/ha against 0.2288 kg/ha in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Ethiopia and Zambia?
- 0.0045 kg/ha, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Zambia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Zambia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Ethiopia ranks 116th and Zambia ranks 114th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).