Europe vs Nigeria: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Europe
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 1.74 kg/ha against 0.7997 kg/ha in Europe, a difference of 0.9403 kg/ha.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 2.2 times Europe's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Europe ranks 4th and Nigeria ranks 4th of 32 groups.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.09 kg/ha | 2.17 kg/ha | 1.08 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 1970s | 1.04 kg/ha | 2.06 kg/ha | 1.02 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 1980s | 0.9671 kg/ha | 1.9 kg/ha | 0.9354 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 1990s | 0.9562 kg/ha | 1.7 kg/ha | 0.7404 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 0.8753 kg/ha | 1.51 kg/ha | 0.6373 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 0.874 kg/ha | 1.5 kg/ha | 0.6262 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 0.8049 kg/ha | 1.67 kg/ha | 0.868 kg/ha | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Europe or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 1.74 kg/ha against 0.7997 kg/ha in Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Europe and Nigeria?
- 0.9403 kg/ha, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Nigeria?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Europe and Nigeria rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Europe ranks 4th and Nigeria ranks 4th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).