Finland vs North Macedonia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Finland
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.7246 kg/ha against 0.6815 kg/ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0431 kg/ha.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 43rd and North Macedonia ranks 44th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7781 kg/ha | 0.6278 kg/ha | 0.1503 kg/ha | Finland |
| 2000s | 0.8329 kg/ha | 0.7839 kg/ha | 0.049 kg/ha | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.7485 kg/ha | 0.7568 kg/ha | 0.0083 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 0.7507 kg/ha | 0.6836 kg/ha | 0.0671 kg/ha | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Finland or North Macedonia?
- Finland, at 0.7246 kg/ha against 0.6815 kg/ha in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Finland and North Macedonia?
- 0.0431 kg/ha, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Finland and North Macedonia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Finland ranks 43rd and North Macedonia ranks 44th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).