Finland vs Yugoslav SFR: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Finland
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.7246 kg/ha against 0.6791 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 0.0455 kg/ha.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Yugoslav SFR's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.
Finland ranks 43rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 45th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Yugoslav SFR in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8442 kg/ha | 0.9054 kg/ha | 0.0612 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 0.8351 kg/ha | 0.8362 kg/ha | 0.0011 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 0.8542 kg/ha | 0.7921 kg/ha | 0.0621 kg/ha | Finland |
| 1990s | 0.8049 kg/ha | 0.7389 kg/ha | 0.0659 kg/ha | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Finland or Yugoslav SFR?
- Finland, at 0.7246 kg/ha against 0.6791 kg/ha in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Finland and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.0455 kg/ha, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Finland and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Finland ranks 43rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 45th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).