Georgia vs Rwanda: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.8438 kg/ha against 0.8231 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.0207 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Rwanda ahead.
Georgia ranks 36th and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5796 kg/ha | 0.6998 kg/ha | 0.1201 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 1.07 kg/ha | 0.9211 kg/ha | 0.1478 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.7949 kg/ha | 0.7124 kg/ha | 0.0825 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.7924 kg/ha | 0.8111 kg/ha | 0.0186 kg/ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Georgia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0.8438 kg/ha against 0.8231 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Georgia and Rwanda?
- 0.0207 kg/ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Rwanda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Rwanda rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 36th and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).