Germany vs Russian Federation: Seed β Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed β Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Germany
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0.8132 kg/ha against 0.7871 kg/ha in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.0261 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Germany ranks 38th and Russian Federation ranks 40th of 201 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8072 kg/ha | 0.9707 kg/ha | 0.1635 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 0.7664 kg/ha | 0.8578 kg/ha | 0.0914 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 0.683 kg/ha | 0.8811 kg/ha | 0.1981 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 0.7612 kg/ha | 0.7855 kg/ha | 0.0243 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed β cropland potassium per unit area, Germany or Russian Federation?
- Germany, at 0.8132 kg/ha against 0.7871 kg/ha in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed β cropland potassium per unit area between Germany and Russian Federation?
- 0.0261 kg/ha, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Germany and Russian Federation rank globally for seed β cropland potassium per unit area?
- Germany ranks 38th and Russian Federation ranks 40th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed β Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).