Greece vs North Macedonia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Greece
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Greece currently reports 0.7337 kg/ha against 0.6815 kg/ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0522 kg/ha.
That makes Greece's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 42nd and North Macedonia ranks 44th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8651 kg/ha | 0.6278 kg/ha | 0.2374 kg/ha | Greece |
| 2000s | 0.784 kg/ha | 0.7839 kg/ha | 0.0001 kg/ha | Greece |
| 2010s | 0.7013 kg/ha | 0.7568 kg/ha | 0.0555 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 0.8796 kg/ha | 0.6836 kg/ha | 0.196 kg/ha | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Greece or North Macedonia?
- Greece, at 0.7337 kg/ha against 0.6815 kg/ha in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Greece and North Macedonia?
- 0.0522 kg/ha, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Greece and North Macedonia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Greece ranks 42nd and North Macedonia ranks 44th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).