Grenada vs Libya: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Grenada
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.1557 kg/ha against 0.1539 kg/ha in Grenada, a difference of 0.0018 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Grenada ranks 140th and Libya ranks 139th of 201 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0692 kg/ha | 0.2252 kg/ha | 0.156 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1970s | 0.0697 kg/ha | 0.2192 kg/ha | 0.1495 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1980s | 0.0887 kg/ha | 0.2125 kg/ha | 0.1237 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1990s | 0.1029 kg/ha | 0.204 kg/ha | 0.1011 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.1114 kg/ha | 0.213 kg/ha | 0.1016 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.1737 kg/ha | 0.2018 kg/ha | 0.028 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.1515 kg/ha | 0.16 kg/ha | 0.0084 kg/ha | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Grenada or Libya?
- Libya, at 0.1557 kg/ha against 0.1539 kg/ha in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Grenada and Libya?
- 0.0018 kg/ha, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Libya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Libya rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Grenada ranks 140th and Libya ranks 139th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).