Guinea vs Uruguay: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Guinea
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.2819 kg/ha against 0.2729 kg/ha in Guinea, a difference of 0.009 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 108th and Uruguay ranks 105th of 201 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0739 kg/ha | 0.3071 kg/ha | 0.2332 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 0.0791 kg/ha | 0.3699 kg/ha | 0.2907 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 0.0862 kg/ha | 0.3347 kg/ha | 0.2485 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 0.111 kg/ha | 0.2933 kg/ha | 0.1823 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.136 kg/ha | 0.47 kg/ha | 0.3339 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.1456 kg/ha | 0.6636 kg/ha | 0.518 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.2512 kg/ha | 0.505 kg/ha | 0.2538 kg/ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Guinea or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.2819 kg/ha against 0.2729 kg/ha in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Guinea and Uruguay?
- 0.009 kg/ha, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and Uruguay rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Guinea ranks 108th and Uruguay ranks 105th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).