Haiti vs Japan: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Haiti
- Japan
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 0.368 kg/ha against 0.3449 kg/ha in Japan, a difference of 0.0231 kg/ha.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Haiti ranks 96th and Japan ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1741 kg/ha | 0.7786 kg/ha | 0.6045 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1970s | 0.1954 kg/ha | 0.4987 kg/ha | 0.3033 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1980s | 0.203 kg/ha | 0.4906 kg/ha | 0.2876 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1990s | 0.1719 kg/ha | 0.4159 kg/ha | 0.2441 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.1638 kg/ha | 0.3453 kg/ha | 0.1815 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.3128 kg/ha | 0.3295 kg/ha | 0.0167 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.3784 kg/ha | 0.3418 kg/ha | 0.0366 kg/ha | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Haiti or Japan?
- Haiti, at 0.368 kg/ha against 0.3449 kg/ha in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Haiti and Japan?
- 0.0231 kg/ha, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Japan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Haiti ranks 96th and Japan ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).