Haiti vs Kenya: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Haiti
- Kenya
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 0.368 kg/ha against 0.3372 kg/ha in Kenya, a difference of 0.0308 kg/ha.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.
Haiti ranks 96th and Kenya ranks 99th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1741 kg/ha | 0.1861 kg/ha | 0.012 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1970s | 0.1954 kg/ha | 0.2191 kg/ha | 0.0237 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1980s | 0.203 kg/ha | 0.2242 kg/ha | 0.0212 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1990s | 0.1719 kg/ha | 0.2058 kg/ha | 0.0339 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2000s | 0.1638 kg/ha | 0.212 kg/ha | 0.0482 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2010s | 0.3128 kg/ha | 0.2272 kg/ha | 0.0857 kg/ha | Haiti |
| 2020s | 0.3784 kg/ha | 0.3085 kg/ha | 0.0698 kg/ha | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Haiti or Kenya?
- Haiti, at 0.368 kg/ha against 0.3372 kg/ha in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Haiti and Kenya?
- 0.0308 kg/ha, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Kenya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Kenya rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Haiti ranks 96th and Kenya ranks 99th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).