Haiti vs Senegal: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Haiti
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 0.371 kg/ha against 0.368 kg/ha in Haiti, a difference of 0.003 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Senegal ahead.
Haiti ranks 96th and Senegal ranks 94th of 201 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1741 kg/ha | 0.5185 kg/ha | 0.3444 kg/ha | Senegal |
| 1970s | 0.1954 kg/ha | 0.6533 kg/ha | 0.4579 kg/ha | Senegal |
| 1980s | 0.203 kg/ha | 0.6532 kg/ha | 0.4502 kg/ha | Senegal |
| 1990s | 0.1719 kg/ha | 0.5966 kg/ha | 0.4247 kg/ha | Senegal |
| 2000s | 0.1638 kg/ha | 0.5594 kg/ha | 0.3956 kg/ha | Senegal |
| 2010s | 0.3128 kg/ha | 0.3776 kg/ha | 0.0648 kg/ha | Senegal |
| 2020s | 0.3784 kg/ha | 0.5035 kg/ha | 0.1251 kg/ha | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Haiti or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 0.371 kg/ha against 0.368 kg/ha in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Haiti and Senegal?
- 0.003 kg/ha, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Senegal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Senegal rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Haiti ranks 96th and Senegal ranks 94th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).