Honduras vs Uganda: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Honduras
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 0.204 kg/ha against 0.2028 kg/ha in Honduras, a difference of 0.0012 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Honduras ranks 126th and Uganda ranks 124th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0823 kg/ha | 0.2809 kg/ha | 0.1986 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1970s | 0.0977 kg/ha | 0.2604 kg/ha | 0.1627 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1980s | 0.1348 kg/ha | 0.1586 kg/ha | 0.0238 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1990s | 0.1496 kg/ha | 0.2068 kg/ha | 0.0572 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 0.2477 kg/ha | 0.2199 kg/ha | 0.0277 kg/ha | Honduras |
| 2010s | 0.2059 kg/ha | 0.1731 kg/ha | 0.0328 kg/ha | Honduras |
| 2020s | 0.1985 kg/ha | 0.2348 kg/ha | 0.0363 kg/ha | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Honduras or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 0.204 kg/ha against 0.2028 kg/ha in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Honduras and Uganda?
- 0.0012 kg/ha, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Uganda rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Honduras ranks 126th and Uganda ranks 124th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).