Hungary vs Serbia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Hungary
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.484 kg/ha against 0.4744 kg/ha in Hungary, a difference of 0.0096 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 75th and Serbia ranks 72nd of 201 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5497 kg/ha | 0.3843 kg/ha | 0.1654 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.5434 kg/ha | 0.4379 kg/ha | 0.1055 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2020s | 0.5098 kg/ha | 0.4726 kg/ha | 0.0372 kg/ha | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Hungary or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0.484 kg/ha against 0.4744 kg/ha in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Hungary and Serbia?
- 0.0096 kg/ha, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Serbia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Hungary ranks 75th and Serbia ranks 72nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).