Hungary vs Sweden: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Hungary
- Sweden
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 0.4744 kg/ha against 0.4632 kg/ha in Sweden, a difference of 0.0112 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 75th and Sweden ranks 78th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 6 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.03 kg/ha | 0.7776 kg/ha | 0.2492 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1970s | 0.8519 kg/ha | 0.7537 kg/ha | 0.0981 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1980s | 0.8391 kg/ha | 0.7511 kg/ha | 0.088 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 1990s | 0.6683 kg/ha | 0.6405 kg/ha | 0.0277 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2000s | 0.4602 kg/ha | 0.5648 kg/ha | 0.1046 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.5434 kg/ha | 0.5161 kg/ha | 0.0272 kg/ha | Hungary |
| 2020s | 0.5098 kg/ha | 0.4694 kg/ha | 0.0403 kg/ha | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Hungary or Sweden?
- Hungary, at 0.4744 kg/ha against 0.4632 kg/ha in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Hungary and Sweden?
- 0.0112 kg/ha, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Sweden rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Hungary ranks 75th and Sweden ranks 78th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).