India vs Myanmar: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- India
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 0.8292 kg/ha against 0.819 kg/ha in India, a difference of 0.0102 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
India ranks 37th and Myanmar ranks 35th of 201 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3585 kg/ha | 0.5892 kg/ha | 0.2307 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 1970s | 0.4248 kg/ha | 0.6195 kg/ha | 0.1946 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 1980s | 0.5029 kg/ha | 0.623 kg/ha | 0.12 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 0.5323 kg/ha | 0.711 kg/ha | 0.1787 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 0.5867 kg/ha | 0.8531 kg/ha | 0.2664 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 0.6815 kg/ha | 0.8577 kg/ha | 0.1762 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 0.7524 kg/ha | 0.8331 kg/ha | 0.0807 kg/ha | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, India or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 0.8292 kg/ha against 0.819 kg/ha in India as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between India and Myanmar?
- 0.0102 kg/ha, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do India and Myanmar rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- India ranks 37th and Myanmar ranks 35th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).