Iraq vs Kenya: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Iraq
- Kenya
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0.356 kg/ha against 0.3372 kg/ha in Kenya, a difference of 0.0188 kg/ha.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 97th and Kenya ranks 99th of 201 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3252 kg/ha | 0.1861 kg/ha | 0.139 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 1970s | 0.2565 kg/ha | 0.2191 kg/ha | 0.0374 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 1980s | 0.3 kg/ha | 0.2242 kg/ha | 0.0758 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 1990s | 0.4473 kg/ha | 0.2058 kg/ha | 0.2415 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 2000s | 0.622 kg/ha | 0.212 kg/ha | 0.41 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 2010s | 0.4631 kg/ha | 0.2272 kg/ha | 0.2359 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 2020s | 0.4626 kg/ha | 0.3085 kg/ha | 0.154 kg/ha | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Iraq or Kenya?
- Iraq, at 0.356 kg/ha against 0.3372 kg/ha in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Iraq and Kenya?
- 0.0188 kg/ha, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Kenya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Kenya rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Iraq ranks 97th and Kenya ranks 99th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).