Italy vs Serbia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Italy
- Serbia
How they compare
Italy currently reports 0.5154 kg/ha against 0.484 kg/ha in Serbia, a difference of 0.0314 kg/ha.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 64th of 186 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5121 kg/ha | 0.3843 kg/ha | 0.1278 kg/ha | Italy |
| 2010s | 0.4678 kg/ha | 0.4379 kg/ha | 0.0299 kg/ha | Italy |
| 2020s | 0.5053 kg/ha | 0.4726 kg/ha | 0.0328 kg/ha | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Italy or Serbia?
- Italy, at 0.5154 kg/ha against 0.484 kg/ha in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Italy and Serbia?
- 0.0314 kg/ha, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Serbia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Italy ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 64th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).