Japan vs Kenya: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Japan
- Kenya
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.3449 kg/ha against 0.3372 kg/ha in Kenya, a difference of 0.0077 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 98th and Kenya ranks 99th of 201 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7786 kg/ha | 0.1861 kg/ha | 0.5925 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1970s | 0.4987 kg/ha | 0.2191 kg/ha | 0.2796 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1980s | 0.4906 kg/ha | 0.2242 kg/ha | 0.2664 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1990s | 0.4159 kg/ha | 0.2058 kg/ha | 0.2102 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.3453 kg/ha | 0.212 kg/ha | 0.1333 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.3295 kg/ha | 0.2272 kg/ha | 0.1023 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.3418 kg/ha | 0.3085 kg/ha | 0.0333 kg/ha | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Japan or Kenya?
- Japan, at 0.3449 kg/ha against 0.3372 kg/ha in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Japan and Kenya?
- 0.0077 kg/ha, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Kenya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Kenya rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Japan ranks 98th and Kenya ranks 99th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).