Jordan vs Zambia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Jordan
- Zambia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.2342 kg/ha against 0.2333 kg/ha in Zambia, a difference of 0.0009 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 113th and Zambia ranks 114th of 201 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6699 kg/ha | 0.1485 kg/ha | 0.5213 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.4443 kg/ha | 0.1497 kg/ha | 0.2946 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 1980s | 0.3128 kg/ha | 0.1587 kg/ha | 0.1541 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.5409 kg/ha | 0.1691 kg/ha | 0.3719 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.4436 kg/ha | 0.1906 kg/ha | 0.253 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.3949 kg/ha | 0.1919 kg/ha | 0.203 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0.2744 kg/ha | 0.2124 kg/ha | 0.0619 kg/ha | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Jordan or Zambia?
- Jordan, at 0.2342 kg/ha against 0.2333 kg/ha in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Jordan and Zambia?
- 0.0009 kg/ha, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Zambia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Jordan ranks 113th and Zambia ranks 114th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).