Kazakhstan vs Sweden: Seed β Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed β Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sweden
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.4673 kg/ha against 0.4632 kg/ha in Sweden, a difference of 0.0041 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 77th and Sweden ranks 78th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4576 kg/ha | 0.6542 kg/ha | 0.1966 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.4589 kg/ha | 0.5648 kg/ha | 0.1059 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.5134 kg/ha | 0.5161 kg/ha | 0.0027 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.4853 kg/ha | 0.4694 kg/ha | 0.0159 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed β cropland potassium per unit area, Kazakhstan or Sweden?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.4673 kg/ha against 0.4632 kg/ha in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed β cropland potassium per unit area between Kazakhstan and Sweden?
- 0.0041 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sweden?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sweden rank globally for seed β cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 77th and Sweden ranks 78th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed β Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).