Kiribati vs Malta: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kiribati
- Malta
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Malta, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 197th and Malta ranks 197th of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1970s | 0 kg/ha | 1.24 kg/ha | 1.24 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1980s | 0 kg/ha | 1.05 kg/ha | 1.05 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1990s | 0 kg/ha | 0.925 kg/ha | 0.925 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2000s | 0 kg/ha | 0.7157 kg/ha | 0.7157 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 kg/ha | 0.4974 kg/ha | 0.4974 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Kiribati or Malta?
- Kiribati, at 0 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Kiribati and Malta?
- 0 kg/ha, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Malta rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kiribati ranks 197th and Malta ranks 197th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).