Kiribati vs Qatar: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kiribati
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 0.0001 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0001 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.
Kiribati ranks 197th and Qatar ranks 195th of 201 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kg/ha | 0.0018 kg/ha | 0.0018 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 1970s | 0 kg/ha | 0.0012 kg/ha | 0.0012 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 1980s | 0 kg/ha | 0.0002 kg/ha | 0.0002 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 1990s | 0 kg/ha | 0.0001 kg/ha | 0.0001 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2000s | 0 kg/ha | 0.0001 kg/ha | 0.0001 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2010s | 0 kg/ha | 0.0001 kg/ha | 0.0001 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha | 0.0001 kg/ha | 0.0001 kg/ha | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Kiribati or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 0.0001 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Kiribati and Qatar?
- 0.0001 kg/ha, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Qatar rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kiribati ranks 197th and Qatar ranks 195th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).