Kyrgyz Republic vs Nepal: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kyrgyz Republic
- Nepal
How they compare
Kyrgyz Republic currently reports 1.4 kg/ha against 1.28 kg/ha in Nepal, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
That makes Kyrgyz Republic's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Nepal ahead.
Kyrgyz Republic ranks 8th and Nepal ranks 11th of 185 countries.
Kyrgyz Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyz Republic | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7901 kg/ha | 0.6828 kg/ha | 0.1073 kg/ha | Kyrgyz Republic |
| 2000s | 1.43 kg/ha | 0.8518 kg/ha | 0.5779 kg/ha | Kyrgyz Republic |
| 2010s | 1.48 kg/ha | 1.12 kg/ha | 0.3658 kg/ha | Kyrgyz Republic |
| 2020s | 1.49 kg/ha | 1.27 kg/ha | 0.2249 kg/ha | Kyrgyz Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Kyrgyz Republic or Nepal?
- Kyrgyz Republic, at 1.4 kg/ha against 1.28 kg/ha in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Kyrgyz Republic and Nepal?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Kyrgyz Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyz Republic and Nepal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyz Republic and Nepal rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kyrgyz Republic ranks 8th and Nepal ranks 11th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).