Kyrgyzstan vs Southern Asia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Southern Asia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1.4 kg/ha against 0.7667 kg/ha in Southern Asia, a difference of 0.6333 kg/ha.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.8 times Southern Asia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Southern Asia ranks 6th of 186 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Southern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7901 kg/ha | 0.5289 kg/ha | 0.2613 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 1.43 kg/ha | 0.5783 kg/ha | 0.8513 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 1.48 kg/ha | 0.6419 kg/ha | 0.8421 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 1.49 kg/ha | 0.7168 kg/ha | 0.7733 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Kyrgyzstan or Southern Asia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 1.4 kg/ha against 0.7667 kg/ha in Southern Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Kyrgyzstan and Southern Asia?
- 0.6333 kg/ha, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Southern Asia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Southern Asia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Southern Asia ranks 6th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).