Kyrgyzstan vs Tajikistan: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 1.62 kg/ha against 1.4 kg/ha in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.22 kg/ha.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Tajikistan ranks 5th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7901 kg/ha | 0.5889 kg/ha | 0.2012 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 1.43 kg/ha | 0.7184 kg/ha | 0.7112 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 1.48 kg/ha | 1.13 kg/ha | 0.3565 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 1.49 kg/ha | 1.6 kg/ha | 0.1102 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Kyrgyzstan or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 1.62 kg/ha against 1.4 kg/ha in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan?
- 0.22 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Tajikistan ranks 5th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).