Latvia vs Paraguay: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0.8831 kg/ha against 0.8739 kg/ha in Latvia, a difference of 0.0092 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 30th and Paraguay ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.82 kg/ha | 0.4374 kg/ha | 1.38 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.45 kg/ha | 0.5907 kg/ha | 0.8552 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.15 kg/ha | 0.8683 kg/ha | 0.2786 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.9173 kg/ha | 0.8391 kg/ha | 0.0781 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Latvia or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 0.8831 kg/ha against 0.8739 kg/ha in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Latvia and Paraguay?
- 0.0092 kg/ha, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Paraguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Paraguay rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 30th and Paraguay ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).