Latvia vs Rwanda: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.8739 kg/ha against 0.8438 kg/ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0301 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 30th and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.82 kg/ha | 0.6998 kg/ha | 1.12 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.45 kg/ha | 0.9211 kg/ha | 0.5249 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.15 kg/ha | 0.7124 kg/ha | 0.4346 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.9173 kg/ha | 0.8111 kg/ha | 0.1062 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Latvia or Rwanda?
- Latvia, at 0.8739 kg/ha against 0.8438 kg/ha in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Latvia and Rwanda?
- 0.0301 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Rwanda rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 30th and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).