Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Lesotho
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1435 kg/ha against 0.1387 kg/ha in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0048 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Lesotho ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1753 kg/ha | 0.3731 kg/ha | 0.1978 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 0.1465 kg/ha | 0.3323 kg/ha | 0.1859 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 0.1217 kg/ha | 0.2827 kg/ha | 0.1611 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.0762 kg/ha | 0.242 kg/ha | 0.1659 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.0953 kg/ha | 0.2132 kg/ha | 0.118 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.0859 kg/ha | 0.1288 kg/ha | 0.043 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.1504 kg/ha | 0.1469 kg/ha | 0.0035 kg/ha | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Lesotho or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.1435 kg/ha against 0.1387 kg/ha in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0048 kg/ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Zimbabwe rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Lesotho ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).