Libya vs Mali: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Libya
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0.1689 kg/ha against 0.1557 kg/ha in Libya, a difference of 0.0132 kg/ha.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mali ahead.
Libya ranks 139th and Mali ranks 136th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2252 kg/ha | 0.2598 kg/ha | 0.0346 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1970s | 0.2192 kg/ha | 0.2893 kg/ha | 0.0701 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1980s | 0.2125 kg/ha | 0.354 kg/ha | 0.1415 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1990s | 0.204 kg/ha | 0.4254 kg/ha | 0.2214 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 0.213 kg/ha | 0.333 kg/ha | 0.12 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 0.2018 kg/ha | 0.2017 kg/ha | 0.0001 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.16 kg/ha | 0.1705 kg/ha | 0.0106 kg/ha | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Libya or Mali?
- Mali, at 0.1689 kg/ha against 0.1557 kg/ha in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Libya and Mali?
- 0.0132 kg/ha, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Mali rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Libya ranks 139th and Mali ranks 136th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).