Libya vs Mauritius: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Libya
- Mauritius
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.1557 kg/ha against 0.1444 kg/ha in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0113 kg/ha.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 139th and Mauritius ranks 141st of 201 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2252 kg/ha | 0.0729 kg/ha | 0.1523 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1970s | 0.2192 kg/ha | 0.0966 kg/ha | 0.1225 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1980s | 0.2125 kg/ha | 0.1176 kg/ha | 0.0948 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1990s | 0.204 kg/ha | 0.1224 kg/ha | 0.0816 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.213 kg/ha | 0.103 kg/ha | 0.11 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.2018 kg/ha | 0.1636 kg/ha | 0.0382 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.16 kg/ha | 0.1444 kg/ha | 0.0156 kg/ha | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Libya or Mauritius?
- Libya, at 0.1557 kg/ha against 0.1444 kg/ha in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Libya and Mauritius?
- 0.0113 kg/ha, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Mauritius rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Libya ranks 139th and Mauritius ranks 141st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).