Libya vs Nauru: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Libya
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 0.161 kg/ha against 0.1557 kg/ha in Libya, a difference of 0.0053 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 139th and Nauru ranks 138th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 6 and Nauru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2252 kg/ha | 0.1075 kg/ha | 0.1177 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1970s | 0.2192 kg/ha | 0.1065 kg/ha | 0.1126 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1980s | 0.2125 kg/ha | 0.1128 kg/ha | 0.0996 kg/ha | Libya |
| 1990s | 0.204 kg/ha | 0.1293 kg/ha | 0.0747 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.213 kg/ha | 0.1561 kg/ha | 0.0569 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.2018 kg/ha | 0.1638 kg/ha | 0.0379 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.16 kg/ha | 0.1605 kg/ha | 0.0005 kg/ha | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Libya or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 0.161 kg/ha against 0.1557 kg/ha in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Libya and Nauru?
- 0.0053 kg/ha, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Nauru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Nauru rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Libya ranks 139th and Nauru ranks 138th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).