Lithuania vs Melanesia: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Lithuania
- Melanesia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.984 kg/ha against 0.0374 kg/ha in Melanesia, a difference of 0.9466 kg/ha.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 26.3 times Melanesia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 16th and Melanesia ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.56 kg/ha | 0.0232 kg/ha | 1.54 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 1.61 kg/ha | 0.0222 kg/ha | 1.58 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.9847 kg/ha | 0.0317 kg/ha | 0.953 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.9125 kg/ha | 0.0361 kg/ha | 0.8764 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Lithuania or Melanesia?
- Lithuania, at 0.984 kg/ha against 0.0374 kg/ha in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Lithuania and Melanesia?
- 0.9466 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Melanesia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Melanesia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Lithuania ranks 16th and Melanesia ranks 18th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).