Malawi vs Romania: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Malawi
- Romania
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 1.14 kg/ha against 1.03 kg/ha in Romania, a difference of 0.11 kg/ha.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 14th and Romania ranks 16th of 201 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.37 kg/ha | 0.7211 kg/ha | 0.6484 kg/ha | Malawi |
| 1970s | 1.19 kg/ha | 0.829 kg/ha | 0.3587 kg/ha | Malawi |
| 1980s | 1.16 kg/ha | 1.02 kg/ha | 0.1462 kg/ha | Malawi |
| 1990s | 1.13 kg/ha | 1.05 kg/ha | 0.0751 kg/ha | Malawi |
| 2000s | 1.09 kg/ha | 0.975 kg/ha | 0.1131 kg/ha | Malawi |
| 2010s | 1.02 kg/ha | 0.9656 kg/ha | 0.058 kg/ha | Malawi |
| 2020s | 1.12 kg/ha | 0.9005 kg/ha | 0.2174 kg/ha | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Malawi or Romania?
- Malawi, at 1.14 kg/ha against 1.03 kg/ha in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Malawi and Romania?
- 0.11 kg/ha, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Romania rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Malawi ranks 14th and Romania ranks 16th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).