Malaysia vs South Sudan: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Malaysia
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0275 kg/ha against 0.0158 kg/ha in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0117 kg/ha.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.7 times Malaysia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 167th and South Sudan ranks 165th of 185 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0181 kg/ha | 0.0261 kg/ha | 0.0079 kg/ha | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0167 kg/ha | 0.0286 kg/ha | 0.0119 kg/ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Malaysia or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0275 kg/ha against 0.0158 kg/ha in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Malaysia and South Sudan?
- 0.0117 kg/ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and South Sudan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Malaysia ranks 167th and South Sudan ranks 165th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).