Mauritania vs Spain: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Mauritania
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 0.284 kg/ha against 0.2784 kg/ha in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0056 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 106th and Spain ranks 103rd of 201 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.223 kg/ha | 0.3839 kg/ha | 0.1609 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1970s | 0.2336 kg/ha | 0.4271 kg/ha | 0.1936 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1980s | 0.2159 kg/ha | 0.4452 kg/ha | 0.2293 kg/ha | Spain |
| 1990s | 0.1886 kg/ha | 0.4249 kg/ha | 0.2363 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2000s | 0.1556 kg/ha | 0.4925 kg/ha | 0.3369 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2010s | 0.239 kg/ha | 0.4914 kg/ha | 0.2524 kg/ha | Spain |
| 2020s | 0.2852 kg/ha | 0.3812 kg/ha | 0.096 kg/ha | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Mauritania or Spain?
- Spain, at 0.284 kg/ha against 0.2784 kg/ha in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Mauritania and Spain?
- 0.0056 kg/ha, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Spain?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Spain rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Mauritania ranks 106th and Spain ranks 103rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).