Mauritania vs Uruguay: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Mauritania
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.2819 kg/ha against 0.2784 kg/ha in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0035 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.
Mauritania ranks 106th and Uruguay ranks 105th of 201 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.223 kg/ha | 0.3071 kg/ha | 0.0841 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 0.2336 kg/ha | 0.3699 kg/ha | 0.1363 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 0.2159 kg/ha | 0.3347 kg/ha | 0.1188 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 0.1886 kg/ha | 0.2933 kg/ha | 0.1047 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.1556 kg/ha | 0.47 kg/ha | 0.3144 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.239 kg/ha | 0.6636 kg/ha | 0.4246 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.2852 kg/ha | 0.505 kg/ha | 0.2198 kg/ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Mauritania or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.2819 kg/ha against 0.2784 kg/ha in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Mauritania and Uruguay?
- 0.0035 kg/ha, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Uruguay rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Mauritania ranks 106th and Uruguay ranks 105th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).