Montenegro vs New Zealand: Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area
Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Montenegro
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.4198 kg/ha against 0.3974 kg/ha in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0224 kg/ha.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was New Zealand ahead.
Montenegro ranks 78th and New Zealand ranks 76th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.8294 kg/ha | 0.8395 kg/ha | 0.0101 kg/ha | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.1155 kg/ha | 0.688 kg/ha | 0.5725 kg/ha | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.5934 kg/ha | 0.434 kg/ha | 0.1594 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium per unit area, Montenegro or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 0.4198 kg/ha against 0.3974 kg/ha in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium per unit area between Montenegro and New Zealand?
- 0.0224 kg/ha, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and New Zealand?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and New Zealand rank globally for seed — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Montenegro ranks 78th and New Zealand ranks 76th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).